Exploded Views: Speculative Form and the Labor of Inquiry 

Please join us for a workshop with Dr. Jonathan P. Eburne, Professor of Comparative Literature, English, and French and Francophone Studies at the Pennsylvania State University where he will discuss his forthcoming book: Exploded Views: Speculative Form and the Labor of Inquiry (University of Minnesota Press, 2025).

We will pre-circulate two chapters from the book prior to the workshop. To receive this selection, please email Tara Kraft-Ainsworth: tara.kraftainsworth@uga.edu. This workshop will be an enriching dialogue about the nuances, curiosity, and forms that underly scholarship and its intersecting fields of study and process. Read what you can but come regardless!

Book Description from the University of Minnesota Press website:

Idiosyncratic essays use their “exploded” forms to examine how inquiry functions

Insect galls, time, memory systems, orgone energy, and a bookstore that doesn’t yet exist. These disparate topics have persistently fascinated scholar Jonathan P. Eburne, yet each defied his previous efforts at classification through scholarly writing, resulting in five essays suspended in process. In Exploded Views, Eburne returns to these essays with the metaphorical tool of the exploded-view diagram, expanding them into entirely new, hybrid forms that unpack their inspirations and trace the wayward paths they followed.

An experiment into the nature of inquiry that spelunks, rather than shies from, the rabbit holes of scholarly curiosity, each essay gives way to sidelights and dilations to reveal the palimpsest of knowledge hiding beneath the surface of the academic form. A book about process—the process of turning ideas into things, and vice versa, as well as the particular tendency for research, scholarly inquiry, and critical writing to come apart and go awry—Exploded Views is a refreshing exploration of how the tools of creative critical thinking work at their most basic level.

Reflecting on the methods of scholarly knowledge production and the contextual factors that shape new ideas, Eburne boldly replaces the seamlessness of the finished manuscript with the friction and even messiness of the incomplete, inviting readers to think in new and invigorating ways.